Sofia Savonen
|
| Kuva: Mikko Bohm
Partio on tekemällä oppimisen liike. Se antaa kadehdittavat eväät loppuelämää varten, ja luo
onnistumisen tunteita, jotka voi saavuttaa vain, kun onnistuu saamaan aikaan jotain omin käsin.
Tekemällä oppimisen mahdollistaa vain tekeminen ja kokeilu. Toisinaan kokeilemisen väyliä
kuitenkin tukitaan ja tikapuita kaadetaan perässä kumoon – tahallisesti tai tahattomasti.
”Tehottomuus”, näennäinen hitaus ja turhilta tuntuvat kuluerät ovat joskus merkki siitä, että
tekemällä oppimista tapahtuu.
Kokeilun mahdollisuus ei ole itsestäänselvyys. Partiolehtien lakkauttaminen on malliesimerkki siitä,
miten kokeilemisen väyliä tukitaan. Useat uutistoimittajat ovat saaneet alkunsa partiolehdistä ja
yksi jos toinenkin luontokuvaaja ja eräopas on saanut kipinän tekemiselleen partiosta.
Yksi tuore uhka partiomaiselle kokeilulle ja omilla käsillä tekemiselle on tekoäly. Tekoälyä
käytetään partiossa jo, mutta yhteisiä pelisääntöjä sen käytölle ei näytä olevan.
Osallistuin hiljattain partiotapahtumaan, jonka ilme oli tehty tekoälyn avulla. Kun huomasin asian,
olin pettynyt. Olen itsekin ollut mukana luomassa partiotapahtumia, joiden ilmeet ja logot ovat
koristaneet nuorten tekijöiden portfolioita heidän pyrkiessään kouluihin ja töihin taidealoille, peli- ja
graafisen suunnittelun pariin. Partiosta vaivihkaa saatu kokemus voi olla juuri se tekijä, joka erottaa
muista ja auttaa eteenpäin kilpaillulla alalla. Puhumattakaan siitä ylpeyden tunteesta, jonka voi
saada, kun oma kädenjälki näkyy leirin kuvastossa.
Tekoälyllä on tietenkin käyttötarkoituksensa. Esimerkiksi lääketieteessä tekoälyn potentiaali on
valtava esimerkiksi sairauksien tunnistamisessa. On kuitenkin paikkoja, joissa tekoälyn käyttö on
vähintäänkin kyseenalaista, sen käytön ympäristövaikutuksista puhumattakaan. Taiteessa tekoäly
on uhka jo yksinään tekijänoikeudelliselta kantilta, sillä keinoälyllä voidaan kuroa kokoon jotain
etäisesti taidetta muistuttavaa taiteilijoita ja heidän teoksiaan kopioimalla. Kirjailija Johannes
Ekholm kiteyttää kolumnissaan tekoälyn luonteen luovan tekemisen näkökulmasta: “Sellaista mitä
ei voi kuvitella ei voi kaivata. Tekoäly osaa kuvitella vain sellaista mitä maailmassa jo on.” Tekoäly
on siis kykenemätön luomaan uutta ja luomaan tekijyyttä.
Tekoälyn ideana onkin useimmiten korvata pikkutarkkuutta tai ikävältä tuntuvaa puurtamista
vaativat tehtävät niin kuin sen käyttäjä käskee. Olennaista onkin, että kysymme, mitä tekoäly
partiossa korvaa.
Partio on tekijöiden liike, ja sen sielu sotii suoraan tekoälyn idean kanssa. Kun ryhdymme luomaan
partion sisältöä tekoälyllä, viemme pois mahdollisuuden tekijyyteen. Luominen ja tekemällä
oppiminen on toisinaan haastavaa, hidasta ja työlästä, ja siksi siinä onnistuminen onkin niin
palkitsevaa. Tärkeintä on tarjota nykyisille ja tulevaisuuden tekijöille samat mahdollisuudet kokeilla
ja harjoitella kuin muille. Se vaatii kärsivällisyyttä, malttia ja kotikutoisuuden syleilyä. Tätä ei
tekoälyn käyttö edistä.
Kirjoittaja on vanha partiotoimittaja, joka ei käyttänyt tekoälyä tätä kirjoittaessaan.
Jaa artikkeli somessa:
Seuraa ja lue artikkeliin liittyviä aiheita: Lukijan mielipide
Viimeisimmät kommentit:
10 589 vastausta artikkeliin “Lukijan mielipide: Partiomaista tekoälyä ei ole”
-
This site was… how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I have found something that
helped me. Thanks a lot!Review my blog post – Ufabet
-
It is not my first time to go to see this web site, i am browsing
this site dailly and take pleasant information from here everyday.Feel free to surf to my blog … Concrete Contractors Houston Texas
-
Компания ОРИОН https://santech-sk.ru/ — надежный поставщик сантехники и инженерного оборудования в Новосибирске. У нас представлен широкий выбор товаров для монтажа, ремонта и обслуживания систем водоснабжения, отопления, канализации и вентиляции от проверенных производителей. Мы предлагаем качественные материалы и комплектующие по выгодным ценам. Наш ассортимент позволяет оснащать объекты любого уровня — от частных домов до крупных промышленных предприятий. Оформите заказ на сайте и получите профессиональную консультацию!
-
Клиника «Красмед» специализируется на экстренной и плановой наркологической помощи более десяти лет. В арсенале клиники:
Подробнее можно узнать тут – http://medicinskij-vyvod-iz-zapoya.ru -
NEW YORK (AP) – Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty again,
convicted Wednesday of a top sex crimes charge at his #MeToo retrial in New York City.
The mixed and partial verdict came more than five
years after his first conviction, which an appeals court overturned last year.The jury returned a verdict on two of three charges against Weinstein, acquitting him of one.
Jurors indicated that they had yet to achieve unanimity on the final count.
That could mean more deliberations on Thursday.The verdict capped an extraordinary fifth day of deliberations.
The jury foreperson complained that he was being bullied by other jurors.
Weinstein´s lawyer then asked for a mistrial, and Weinstein himself addressed the judge
without jurors in the courtroom, imploring him to end the case without a verdict.Minutes later, the jury of seven women and five men declared the
ailing 73-year-old guilty of one count of criminal sex act, which carries a maximum sentence
of 25 years in prison. Weinstein denies raping or sexually assaulting anyone.
Once he´s sentenced, he can appeal.Here´s what you need to know about the verdict:
Harvey Weinstein jokes with press photographers in Manhattan criminal court as the
jury in his retrial deliberates, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in New York.
Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP)Jurors convicted Weinstein of one count of criminal sex act,
finding that he forcibly performed oral sex on a TV and movie producer and production assistant,
Miriam Haley, nearly two decades ago.Haley, who had a short stint working on the Weinstein-produced ”Project Runway,” testified that he assaulted her in July 2006 after inviting her to stop by
his SoHo apartment before a flight his company booked her
on the next day to Los Angeles to attend a movie premiere.Haley testified that Weinstein backed her into a bedroom, pushed
her onto a bed and forced oral sex on her, undeterred by her kicks and pleas of, ”No, no – it´s not going to happen.”Weinstein was convicted of the same charge at his first trial.
Haley, who has also gone by the name Mimi Haleyi, told jurors that she was never interested
in any sexual or romantic relationship with Weinstein but still wanted his help professionally.She acknowledged she kept in touch and exchanged warm messages with him and accepted an invitation to his hotel
room two weeks after the alleged assault, when she said he pulled her into bed for
sex.Weinstein acquitted of a charge of criminal sex act relating to a previously uncharged allegation that
he forced oral sex on Kaja (KEYE´-ah) Sokola, a psychologist and former Polish model and actor, at a
Manhattan hotel in 2006 just before her 20th birthday.Sokola, who wasn´t a part of Weinstein´s first trial, testified that Weinstein assaulted her after
luring her to his hotel room by telling her had a script to show her.
As he pushed her onto a bed, stripped off her boots, her stockings and her underwear, ”my soul was removed from me,” she said.Now 39, Sokola said he held her down while ignoring her pleas of ”please don´t, please stop, I don´t want this.” She said she tried to push him away but was
no match against the much larger Weinstein.Sokola also testified that Weinstein sexually assaulted her when she was 16 years old, but that allegation was
beyond legal time limits for a potential criminal charge.Sokola said she stayed in touch with Weinstein because she had dreams
of an acting career.She went to authorities in January 2020, a few days into Weinstein´s first trial.
Prosecutors halted their investigation after Weinstein was convicted, but revived it when the verdict was
thrown out last year.The jury hasn’t reached a verdict on a third-degree rape charge involving Jessica Mann´s allegation that Weinstein assaulted her in March 2013.
Mann, a cosmetologist and hairstylist, said she met Weinstein at a
party in late 2012 or early 2013, when she was 27
and trying to launch an acting career.She alleges Weinstein trapped her in a Manhattan hotel room, demanded that she undress as he loomed
over her, grabbed her arms and raped her after, she believes, he injected himself with an erection-promoting drug that she later found in the bathroom trash.Mann said she had a consensual, on-and-off relationship with the then-married Weinstein, but that he was volatile and violated her if she refused him.
She said she kept in touch with Weinstein after the alleged rape, telling jurors she ”compartmentalized the part of Harvey that was hurting me,” and that flattery
and friendliness ”kept the peace.”The Associated Press generally does not name sexual assault accusers without their permission, which Haley, Mann and Sokola have given.
New York´s highest court, the Court of Appeals, threw
out Weinstein´s conviction in April 2024.In a 4-3 decision, the court said the judge in the first trial,
James Burke, denied Weinstein a fair trial by
letting three women testify about allegations that didn’t
result in charges and by deciding that prosecutors could confront Weinstein,
if he testified, about stories of him behaving brutishly.The court labeled the allegations against Weinstein ”appalling, shameful, repulsive conduct” but
warned that ”destroying a defendant´s character under the guise of prosecutorial need”
did not justify some trial evidence and testimony.Burke´s term expired at the end of 2022, and he is no longer a judge.
Prosecutors were not allowed to retry Weinstein on charges that he was
acquitted of during his first trial, including predatory sexual assault and one count of first-degree rape.Weinstein is appealing his conviction in Los Angeles in a similar case in 2022.
Jurors there found him guilty of three of seven charges, including
rape, and he was sentenced to 16 years in prison. Weinstein´s lawyers argued
he did not get a fair trial.They contend that the judge in the California case wrongly allowed jurors to know about Weinstein´s 2020 New York conviction, and that
the jury was unfairly prejudiced by testimony from women about
alleged assaults Weinstein was not charged with.__
Associated Press journalists Ruth Brown and Philip Marcelo
contributed to this report.Harvey Weinstein speaks to Judge Curtis Farber regarding juror #1
in Manhattan criminal court, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in New
York. (Elizabeth Williams via AP)Harvey Weinstein appears in state court in Manhattan for his retrial, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in New York.
(Steven Hirsch /New York Post via AP, Pool)My web page :: xxx việt nam không che
Vastaa